<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Software Development on dev notes</title>
    <link>https://juhanakristianblog.netlify.app/tags/software-development/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Software Development on dev notes</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://juhanakristianblog.netlify.app/tags/software-development/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>What I really want from AI</title>
      <link>https://juhanakristianblog.netlify.app/posts/what-i-really-want-from-ai/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://juhanakristianblog.netlify.app/posts/what-i-really-want-from-ai/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;I&amp;rsquo;ve been using GitHub Copilot since it became available in the technical preview in 2021. During this time the field of AI developer tools has changed dramatically. Now we have many alternatives to Copilot such as Cursor, Windsurf and Aider. The tools have not only improved the autocomplete suggestions developers get but also changed the workflow of developers using them. Cursor specifically was the first tool I felt was a major step forward in using AI as coding assistant. It seemed to understand the context and the project I was working on much better than Copilot and was able to make large changes spanning multiple files. Recently GitHub has added to Copilot the support for editing multiple files and providing a larger context for the LLM to work with similarly to what Cursor does. It seems to work reasonably well in most cases even if I have to make some changes to the results to make them usable. I think this is already a huge step forward from the initial Copilot versions.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
